Skip to content

Marketing Thought

Clarifying management/marketing theory

Menu
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Marketing Strategy
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
Menu

Political Candidate Brand Strength

Posted on February 7, 2020September 29, 2021 by neilbendle

Beth Fossen, David Schweidel and Michael Lewis published a paper on political candidate brand strength in Customer Needs and Solutions. They used inspiration from the idea of performance premium measures of brand strength. In essence, these measures consider how a brand should be doing given certain important features. Then they look at how it is really doing. Finally, they ascribe any difference between achievement and expected achievement to the hard to measure brand aspect.

Political Candidate Brand Strength Given You Don’t Have Price

How can you assess brand performance? A first possibility is to use price. (Consumers are willing to pay more for the brand than ‘expected’.) Another possibility is to use revenue. (The brand gains more sales in the stores than ‘expected’). Clearly this isn’t very meaningful in politics. You cannot reliably pay to get your favorite candidate elected. (Or least we hope not). That said you can see how the candidate performs in terms of votes. You can compare this to such things as the partisan lean of their districts. How would a generic candidate have done? This allows the analyst to infer what the politician themselves are bringing compared to how a generic candidate would do.

Trending
The Destiny of Accounting Measures of Customer Assets

Political Candidate Brand Strength

Brand Strength And Advertising

The authors considered how brand strength links to advertising. For example, do stronger candidates advertise more? Or do they advertise less? To do this they need multiple observations.

“We employ data on U.S. House of Representatives candidates from the 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2012 elections, providing us with up to four elections in which to observe the performance of the candidates. The repeated measures nature of our data allows us to infer candidate-specific, time-invariant effects that reflect the strength of their brands.”

Fossen, Schweidel and Lewis, 2019

The conclusion is that brand strength differs a lot. Candidate quality really does matter.

Strong Candidates Save You Money

Using Republicans as their focus, they find that strong candidates advertise less, as do their opponents.

“…strong Republican brands and the outside organizations supporting them may deem excessive advertising to be unnecessary. Likewise, it can be speculated that Democratic candidates facing strong Republican opponents and outside organizations supporting them might consider advertising a waste given the strength of the opponent and their odds of success.”

Fossen, Schweidel and Lewis, 2019

Having a strong candidate can save you a lot of money in advertising.

For more on political marketing see here. For more on leadership in politics see here, here, and here.

Read: Beth L. Fossen, David A. Schweidel and Michael Lewis (2019), Examining Brand Strength of Political Candidates: a Performance Premium Approach, Customer Needs and Solutions, December 2019, Volume 6, Issue 3–4, pp 63–75

Share on Social Media
twitter facebook linkedin reddit

  • A Business Case For Marketing Budgets
  • Marketing Should Matter To Finance People
  • The Future Is Abundance
  • Comparing Text Classification Methods

MASB’s Common Language Dictionary

Need a marketing definition? Use MASB’s Common Language Marketing Dictionary. Click for the MASB Common Language Marketing Dictionary

Pages in Marketing Thought

  • A Plea About Language Used In Marketing
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Behavioral Econ For Kids: The Cartoon Book
  • Data Visualization Advice
  • Machine Learning (ML) And Marketing: What Should You Know?
  • Marketing In The Movies
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
    • Chapter of Marketing Metrics 4th Edition, Free Sample
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Marketing Strategy
    • Measuring Culture Is A Challenge, But Don’t Be Silly
    • Rationality And Marketing Strategy
    • Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning
    • Strategy And Evolutionary Thinking
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
    • Brand Valuation: Progress But Lots More Needed
    • Customer Equity: Nice Idea, Bit Of A Mess In Execution
    • How To Use, And Misuse, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)
    • Is ROI The Most Abused Term In Marketing?
    • Market Share: Always An Indicator Never A Target
    • Marketing Accounts: A Better Way To Measure Marketing Performance
    • Measuring Competition With The Bendle Panda Index
    • Net Promoter Score: Sadly Not As Magical As Supporters Suggest
    • Profit Measurement: Choose Your Own Level Is Problematic
    • Tobin’s Q: Why Academics Should Listen To Managers
    • Total Q, A New Improved Tobin’s Q? Not By Much
    • Value Of A Like: Do Not Use For Budgeting
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
  • Recommended Books
©2022 Marketing Thought | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb
Go to mobile version