Skip to content

Marketing Thought

Clarifying management/marketing theory

Menu
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Sustainable Marketing Strategy
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
Menu

Does Acquisition Cost Reduce CLV? No

Posted on January 10, 2013September 14, 2021 by neilbendle

Marketing suffers from serious definitional problems which undermine the communication function of metrics. For example, Does Acquisition Cost Reduce CLV? I therefore recommend a step forward; lets all exclude acquisition costs from customer lifetime value (CLV) calculations.

CLV Is The Net Present Value Of A Customer Relationship

Customer lifetime value is the net present value of a customer relationship. There are strong assumptions and fiddly discounting but the idea is simple. Valuing a customer is analogous to valuing a firm. When valuing a firm you determine the net cash inflows the firm will generate, when valuing a customer you determine the net cash inflows the customer will generate.

But Make Sure You Exclude Acqusition Costs

Managers naturally want to be sure to include important costs but acquisition costs should be excluded from CLV calculations. To see the problem that including acquisition costs causes imagine buying a company which has a market capitalization of $1 billion. What is the value of the company? $1 billion. You will have to spend a billion dollars to buy the company but that does not mean the company now has no value. It is worth a rather significant one billion dollars.

Trending
Defining Customer Experience And Its Role In Customer Journey

Similarly imagine a customer is worth one thousand dollars to a company. Whatever acquiring the customer costs the acquired customer is still worth one thousand dollars.

As some of my MBA professors noted a few years ago: “Although [acquisition cost] is certainly relevant to the prospecting decision… it is never included as a component of expected CLV.” (Pfeifer, Haskins and Conroy 2005)

Why Subtract Acqusition Costs From CLV? It Just Makes The Metric Less Useful?
Why Subtract Acqusition Costs From CLV? It Just Makes The Metric Less Useful?

Does Acquisition Cost Reduce CLV? No

Acquisition costs are very important and should be used to assess whether it makes sense to acquire a customer. That said acquisition costs should not reduce CLV or else the metric becomes a lot less useful.

For more on CLV see here.

Read: Phillip Pfeifer, Mark Haskins and Robert Conroy, “Customer Lifetime Value, Customer Profitability, and the Treatment of Acquisition Spending“, Journal of Managerial Issues, XXVII, 1, Spring 2005, Pages 11-25

Share on Social Media
twitter facebook linkedin reddit

  • Managing For Stakeholders
  • Net Positive Business
  • Planning For Sustainability
  • What’s With The Alexander Stuff?

MASB’s Common Language Dictionary

Need a marketing definition? Use MASB’s Common Language Marketing Dictionary. Click for the MASB Common Language Marketing Dictionary

Pages in Marketing Thought

  • A Plea About Language Used In Marketing
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Behavioral Econ For Kids: The Cartoon Book
  • Data Visualization Advice
  • Machine Learning (ML) And Marketing: What Should You Know?
  • Marketing In The Movies
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
    • Chapter of Marketing Metrics 4th Edition, Free Sample
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Marketing Thought Website Data
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
    • Brand Valuation: Progress But Lots More Needed
    • Customer Equity: Nice Idea, Bit Of A Mess In Execution
    • How To Use, And Misuse, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)
    • Is ROI The Most Abused Term In Marketing?
    • Market Share: Always An Indicator Never A Target
    • Marketing Accounts: A Better Way To Measure Marketing Performance
    • Measuring Competition With The Bendle Panda Index
    • Net Promoter Score: Sadly Not As Magical As Supporters Suggest
    • Profit Measurement: Choose Your Own Level Is Problematic
    • Tobin’s Q: Why Academics Should Listen To Managers
    • Total Q, A New Improved Tobin’s Q? Not By Much
    • Value Of A Like: Do Not Use For Budgeting
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
  • Recommended Books
  • Sustainable Marketing Strategy
    • B Corp Research Papers
    • Marketing Strategy
      • Measuring Culture Is A Challenge, But Don’t Be Silly
      • Rationality And Marketing Strategy
      • Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning
      • Strategy And Evolutionary Thinking
  • Sustainable Marketing Strategy Cases
©2023 Marketing Thought | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb
Go to mobile version