Skip to content

Marketing Thought

Clarifying management/marketing theory

Menu
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Sustainable Marketing Strategy
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
Menu

What Has Been Studied In Academic Sustainable Marketing Research?

Posted on July 6, 2023July 6, 2023 by neilbendle

It is (almost) always interesting to go back and discover what has been studied in the past. Academic journals in the marketing field have been with us for many generations so we have a large sample to look at. Brian Chabowski and colleagues in 2011 reviewed what had been studied in academic sustainable marketing research.

Fifty-One Years

The authors looked at 51 years of research across 36 journals. The first thing to note is that academic sustainable marketing research isn’t just a new thing. They searched on a list of inclusion (e.g., Corporate Social Responsibility) and exclusion (e.g., Sustainable Compoetitive Advanatge) keywords. They were able to find 76,342 citations related to 1,320 articles. From this list of citations, they built up a social network. Essentially, they looked at how papers connect up to other papers in the same way we might look at how people link up to other people on Facebook or Linkedin.

What Did Academic Sustainable Marketing Research Study?

They found that the key areas for such research could be put under the headings of:

  • Citizenship behavior
  • Stakeholder theory
  • corporate performance, and
  • Triple Bottom Line

They then specified 5 themes in the discussion of academic sustainable marketing research:

  • External-internal focus
  • Social-environmental emphasis
  • Legal-ethical-discretionary intent
  • Marketing assets, and
  • Financial performance
Academic Sustainable Marketing Research Themes
Academic Sustainable Marketing Research Themes

Periods of Study

The authors divided their study into three periods

1950-1980s: A lot (but not all) of the work in this period was focused on ethics.

… a direct relation cannot be established between the early (1950-1980s) and later (1990s and 2000s) research on sustainability.

Chabowski et al, 2011, page 60

In some ways, there was a break and a reinvention of the field after the 1980s.

1990s: Familiar trends started to emerge. CSR became related to ethics and economic discussions began to emerge.

2000s: CSR remained critical to the discussion but more depth was added. Moderation (how effects change depending upon another variable) and mediation (what links up two ideas) became to be central to the discussion. There was a greater emphasis on firm resources and competitive performance.

Overall, it is fascinating to see how studies change over time. What will be talking about in another 50 years?

For more on sustainable marketing see here and for some history-related sustainability posts see here, here, and here.

Read: Chabowski, Brian R., Jeannette A. Mena, and Tracy L. Gonzalez-Padron. (2011) “The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: A basis for future research opportunities.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39, 55-70.

Share on Social Media
x facebook linkedin reddit

  • Escape From Poverty And Disease
  • Comprehensive Guide To Drawdown Solutions
  • Must Firms Maximize Shareholder Value?
  • People Aren’t Getting Worse

MASB’s Universal Marketing Dictionary

Need a marketing definition? Use MASB’s Universal Marketing Dictionary. Click for the MASB Universal Marketing Dictionary

Pages in Marketing Thought

  • A Plea About Language Used In Marketing
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Behavioral Econ For Kids: The Cartoon Book
  • Data Visualization Advice
  • Machine Learning (ML) And Marketing: What Should You Know?
  • Marketing In The Movies
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
    • Chapter of Marketing Metrics 4th Edition, Free Sample
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Marketing Thought Website Data
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
    • Brand Valuation: Progress But Lots More Needed
    • Customer Equity: Nice Idea, Bit Of A Mess In Execution
    • How To Use, And Misuse, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)
    • Is ROI The Most Abused Term In Marketing?
    • Market Share: Always An Indicator Never A Target
    • Marketing Accounts: A Better Way To Measure Marketing Performance
    • Measuring Competition With The Bendle Panda Index
    • Net Promoter Score: Sadly Not As Magical As Supporters Suggest
    • Profit Measurement: Choose Your Own Level Is Problematic
    • Tobin’s Q: Why Academics Should Listen To Managers
    • Total Q, A New Improved Tobin’s Q? Not By Much
    • Value Of A Like: Do Not Use For Budgeting
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
  • Recommended Books
  • Sustainable Marketing Strategy
    • B Corp Research Papers
    • Marketing Strategy
      • Measuring Culture Is A Challenge, But Don’t Be Silly
      • Rationality And Marketing Strategy
      • Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning
      • Strategy And Evolutionary Thinking
  • Sustainable Marketing Strategy Cases
©2023 Marketing Thought | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb
Go to mobile version