Skip to content

Marketing Thought

Clarifying management/marketing theory

Menu
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Marketing Strategy
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
Menu

Teaching CLV Badly

Posted on January 20, 2017September 29, 2021 by neilbendle

Ex-Ivey PHD student and now University of Calgary professor, Charan Bagga, and I have just published an article. This focused on the teaching of CLV (Customer Lifetime Value). We surveyed the state of case-based teaching materials related to CLV and found them a pretty shoddy bunch. Teaching CLV badly seems to be the default way to teach CLV.

CLV Without Any Managerial Application

One problem is that many of the cases calculated CLV in a way which had no obvious managerial application. If you want to decide how much to spend on acquiring customers, you really must discount any cash you’ll receive in the future. Doing so allows you to properly compare it to any cash that needs to be invested now. Similarly you can’t use CLV to decide how much to spend on acquiring a customer if you subtract the acquisition cost before reporting CLV. This is because CLV is already net of acquisition costs.

Simple Is Good: Too Simple To Be Useful Is Bad
Simple Is Good: Too Simple To Be Useful Is Bad

Teaching CLV Badly: Confusion Abounds

We examined 33 cases and related materials.

Trending
Defining Customer Experience And Its Role In Customer Journey

[These] show considerable confusion in teaching materials; they contain incorrect formula, erroneous claims, and contradict other materials from the same school.

Bendle and Bagga, 2016, page 1.

Teaching CLV Better

Perhaps most importantly we have some pretty clear recommendations.

[We] recommend educators always (a) use contribution margin, (b) discount cash flows, and (c) never subtract acquisition costs before reporting CLV. .

Bendle and Bagga, 2016, page 1

The teaching of CLV is currently pretty awful. Still the good news is that it should be relatively easy to improve by following some pretty basic advice. It really isn’t hard to do a much better job.

For more on CLV see here. Many of the materials you need to teach CLV better are there.

How To Use, And Misuse, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)

Read: Neil Bendle and Charan Bagga, (2016),  The Confusion About CLV In Case-Based Teaching Materials, Marketing Education Review, This link might work if you want to see the full paper: The Confusion About CLV in Case-Based Teaching Materials

Share on Social Media
twitter facebook linkedin reddit

  • Internal Measurement Of Brand Value
  • Regulation And Business Responsibility
  • Leadership, Power, And Morality
  • Gaining And Using Power

MASB’s Common Language Dictionary

Need a marketing definition? Use MASB’s Common Language Marketing Dictionary. Click for the MASB Common Language Marketing Dictionary

Pages in Marketing Thought

  • A Plea About Language Used In Marketing
  • Advice For The Marketing Academic Job Market
  • Behavioral Econ For Kids: The Cartoon Book
  • Data Visualization Advice
  • Machine Learning (ML) And Marketing: What Should You Know?
  • Marketing In The Movies
  • Marketing Metrics 4th Edition Book
    • Chapter of Marketing Metrics 4th Edition, Free Sample
  • Marketing PhD Applications
  • Marketing Strategy
    • Measuring Culture Is A Challenge, But Don’t Be Silly
    • Rationality And Marketing Strategy
    • Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning
    • Strategy And Evolutionary Thinking
  • Neil Bendle
  • Popular Marketing Metrics: How Not To Mess Them Up
    • Brand Valuation: Progress But Lots More Needed
    • Customer Equity: Nice Idea, Bit Of A Mess In Execution
    • How To Use, And Misuse, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)
    • Is ROI The Most Abused Term In Marketing?
    • Market Share: Always An Indicator Never A Target
    • Marketing Accounts: A Better Way To Measure Marketing Performance
    • Measuring Competition With The Bendle Panda Index
    • Net Promoter Score: Sadly Not As Magical As Supporters Suggest
    • Profit Measurement: Choose Your Own Level Is Problematic
    • Tobin’s Q: Why Academics Should Listen To Managers
    • Total Q, A New Improved Tobin’s Q? Not By Much
    • Value Of A Like: Do Not Use For Budgeting
  • Public Policy, Behavioral Economics and Marketing
  • Recommended Books
©2022 Marketing Thought | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb
Go to mobile version